Because Google's training data is probably the entire (search-engine-accesible part of) the internet, or at least a portion of it that includes the Onion, conspiracy sites, and Reddit shitposters named "fucksmith".How the hell is X's context bot, which was trained on Twitter data of all things, consistently better at fact checking than Google is at fact finding?
This is incredibly irresponsible. Just because it's popular doesn't mean it's the best.
I think you underestimate how much of Twitter is shitposting, conspiracy theories, and people who think they're the Onion. (I mean, hell, the sheer volume of disinformation on there is the whole reason the fact-check bot exists.)Because Google's training data is probably the entire (search-engine-accesible part of) the internet, or at least a portion of it that includes the Onion, conspiracy sites, and Reddit shitposters named "fucksmith".